<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Abusive Language | Language Technologies Lab</title><link>https://nlp.unibo.it/tag/abusive-language/</link><atom:link href="https://nlp.unibo.it/tag/abusive-language/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Abusive Language</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Multi-cultural Abusive and Hate Speech Detection</title><link>https://nlp.unibo.it/proposals/unstructured-knowledge/hatespeech/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://nlp.unibo.it/proposals/unstructured-knowledge/hatespeech/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="context"&gt;Context&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What counts as abusive or hate speech depends on the socio-cultural context: the culture, norms, and laws of the people who read a text.
The same text might be deemed offensive in one culture, allowed in another, and legally prosecutable in a third.
A detection model is a machine learning model that flags a text as abusive or hate speech.
It learns from labeled examples.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="objective"&gt;Objective&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This proposal evaluates how different definitions of abusive and hate speech affect detection models.
The aim is to promote awareness when developing accurate detection models.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;figure class="lt-viz lt-svg"&gt;
&lt;svg viewBox="0 0 800 376" role="img" aria-labelledby="hatespeech-defs-title" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"&gt;
&lt;defs&gt;&lt;marker id="hatespeech-defs-arrow" viewBox="0 0 10 10" refX="8" refY="5" markerWidth="7" markerHeight="7" orient="auto-start-reverse"&gt;&lt;path class="lt-s-head" d="M0 0 L10 5 L0 10 z"/&gt;&lt;/marker&gt;&lt;/defs&gt;
&lt;title id="hatespeech-defs-title"&gt;The same text goes to three socio-cultural contexts, cultures A, B, and C, each with its own definition of abusive and hate speech. Culture A deems the text offensive, culture B allows it, and culture C deems it legally prosecutable. All three judgments feed a detection model, and the question is how each definition affects it.&lt;/title&gt;
&lt;text class="lt-s-sub" x="40" y="22"&gt;INPUT TEXT&lt;/text&gt;
&lt;rect class="lt-s-tok" x="300" y="32" width="200" height="40" rx="8"/&gt;
&lt;text class="lt-s-txt lt-s-strong" x="400" y="57"&gt;the same text&lt;/text&gt;
&lt;path class="lt-s-arrow" marker-end="url(#hatespeech-defs-arrow)" d="M400 76 V90 H160 V118"/&gt;
&lt;path class="lt-s-arrow" marker-end="url(#hatespeech-defs-arrow)" d="M400 90 V118"/&gt;
&lt;path class="lt-s-arrow" marker-end="url(#hatespeech-defs-arrow)" d="M400 90 H640 V118"/&gt;
&lt;rect class="lt-s-box lt-s-sel" x="60" y="122" width="200" height="56" rx="12"/&gt;
&lt;text class="lt-s-txt lt-s-strong" x="160" y="146"&gt;Culture A&lt;/text&gt;
&lt;text class="lt-s-txt lt-s-small" x="160" y="166"&gt;definition A&lt;/text&gt;
&lt;rect class="lt-s-box lt-s-sel" x="300" y="122" width="200" height="56" rx="12"/&gt;
&lt;text class="lt-s-txt lt-s-strong" x="400" y="146"&gt;Culture B&lt;/text&gt;
&lt;text class="lt-s-txt lt-s-small" x="400" y="166"&gt;definition B&lt;/text&gt;
&lt;rect class="lt-s-box lt-s-sel" x="540" y="122" width="200" height="56" rx="12"/&gt;
&lt;text class="lt-s-txt lt-s-strong" x="640" y="146"&gt;Culture C&lt;/text&gt;
&lt;text class="lt-s-txt lt-s-small" x="640" y="166"&gt;definition C&lt;/text&gt;
&lt;path class="lt-s-arrow" marker-end="url(#hatespeech-defs-arrow)" d="M160 182 V212"/&gt;
&lt;path class="lt-s-arrow" marker-end="url(#hatespeech-defs-arrow)" d="M400 182 V212"/&gt;
&lt;path class="lt-s-arrow" marker-end="url(#hatespeech-defs-arrow)" d="M640 182 V212"/&gt;
&lt;rect class="lt-s-label" x="62" y="216" width="196" height="36" rx="18"/&gt;
&lt;text class="lt-s-txt lt-s-strong lt-s-labeltxt" x="160" y="239"&gt;offensive&lt;/text&gt;
&lt;rect class="lt-s-label" x="302" y="216" width="196" height="36" rx="18"/&gt;
&lt;text class="lt-s-txt lt-s-strong lt-s-labeltxt" x="400" y="239"&gt;allowed&lt;/text&gt;
&lt;rect class="lt-s-label" x="542" y="216" width="196" height="36" rx="18"/&gt;
&lt;text class="lt-s-txt lt-s-strong lt-s-labeltxt" x="640" y="239"&gt;legally prosecutable&lt;/text&gt;
&lt;path class="lt-s-arrow" marker-end="url(#hatespeech-defs-arrow)" d="M160 256 V296"/&gt;
&lt;path class="lt-s-arrow" marker-end="url(#hatespeech-defs-arrow)" d="M400 256 V296"/&gt;
&lt;path class="lt-s-arrow" marker-end="url(#hatespeech-defs-arrow)" d="M640 256 V296"/&gt;
&lt;rect class="lt-s-box lt-s-pred" x="60" y="300" width="680" height="56" rx="12"/&gt;
&lt;text class="lt-s-txt lt-s-strong" x="400" y="324"&gt;Detection model&lt;/text&gt;
&lt;text class="lt-s-txt lt-s-small" x="400" y="344"&gt;how does each definition affect it?&lt;/text&gt;
&lt;/svg&gt;
&lt;figcaption&gt;One text judged in three socio-cultural contexts, each with its own definition of abusive and hate speech. Cultures A, B, and C are placeholders, not real cultures.&lt;/figcaption&gt;
&lt;/figure&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>